Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

0808

reference
233-tree-1
name
0808
tree-preservation-order

undefined

233-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.004157 50.853037)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.004057 50.853027,-1.004062 50.853046,-1.004076 50.853064,-1.004097 50.853078,-1.004125 50.853087,-1.004156 50.853091,-1.004186 50.853088,-1.004214 50.853079,-1.004236 50.853065,-1.004251 50.853048,-1.004256 50.853029,-1.004252 50.853009,-1.004238 50.852991,-1.004216 50.852977,-1.004189 50.852968,-1.004158 50.852965,-1.004127 50.852968,-1.004099 50.852976,-1.004077 50.852990,-1.004063 50.853007,-1.004057 50.853027)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL